On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:06 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 26, 2015, at 7:11 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is one of those things where the middle ground compromise is >> distinctly worse than either pole. Either act regionally with policies >> and address pools for use within the region or act globally with >> policies and address pools for use worldwide. The middle ground lends >> itself only to unfair advantage for multinational operators who can >> shop multiple regions for advantage. > > You have a reasonable argument for why there should be globally-coordinated > policy in this area. If you need any assistance when developing your > proposal, > please reach out to the ARIN Advisory Council for assistance. Ultimately, it > is up > to the globally community whether a globally uniform transfer policy is > desirable.
Hi John, Respectfully, we have barely a weak consensus, if that, on what the transfer policies should be within the region. There is wide disagreement as to whether transfers should have any form of needs testing save for the movement of tender. In that environment it makes sense to pursue globally coordinated consensus on transfer policies? Surely you jest. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
