On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:05 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason for regional registries was not intended for policy > purposes, but for administrative convenience for those requesting > resources (such as local hours and language support)
Hi John, If you propose that the registries' structure is intended to offer IP addressing "flags of convenience" comparable to what happens with international shipping, please say so plainly. That approach would certainly justify ITU setting up shop as a sixth world-level registry serving governments and international telephony organizations. If that's not your intention, then I frankly have no idea what the quoted statement is supposed to mean and would invite you to clarify it further. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
