I support this. The attestation, at least for US public companies, is not taken lightly. Its toothless, but not meaningless even if only symbolic.
Best, -M< > On Aug 20, 2015, at 18:32, Richard J. Letts <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm unconvinced; the new policy leaves it too open for enabling speculation. > > Richard Letts > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Rob Seastrom >> Sent: 20 August 2015 12:46 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7 >> >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> It's been almost two months since ARIN 2015-7 was submitted. Anyone have >> thoughts on "Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 >> transfers"? >> >> The AC would love your input. >> >> Draft policy text follows: >> >> Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7 >> Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers >> >> Date: 23 June 2015 >> >> Problem statement: >> >> ARIN transfer policy currently inherits all its demonstrated need >> requirements for IPv4 transfers from NRPM sections 4. Because that section >> was written primarily to deal with free pool allocations, it is much more >> complicated than is really necessary for transfers. In practice, ARIN >> staff applies much more lenient needs assessment to section 8 IPv4 >> transfer requests than to free pool requests, as 24-month needs are much >> more difficult to assess to the same level of detail. >> >> This proposal seeks to dramatically simplify the needs assessment process >> for 8.3 transfers, while still allowing organizations with corner-case >> requirements to apply under existing policy if necessary. >> >> Policy statement: >> >> 8.1.x Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers >> >> IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the >> requesting organization must attest) that they will use at least 50% of >> their aggregate IPv4 addresses (including the requested resources) on an >> operational network within 24 months. >> >> Organizations that do not meet the simplified criteria above may instead >> demonstrate the need for number resources using the criteria in section >> 4 of the NRPM. >> >> Comments: >> >> a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate >> >> b. Anything else >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
