On 8/20/2015 2:05 PM, David Huberman wrote:
Hi Bill,
> Still against it because it still applies to out-region transfers
where ARIN no
> longer has access to it and CAN NOT revoke it for fraud when the
attestation
> turns out to be untrue.
So I get what you're saying. And you're right. You and I petition
ARIN, attest
that we forecast to use a /X, we're lying, and we transfer it out of
the region and
ARIN is done with it - ARIN has no control over the block transferred out.
That is true today. ARIN does not have any control over how IP blocks
are used (or transferred) today.
Which is why I'm supportive of this policy... it makes the right thing
(recording a transfer properly in the ARIN database) happen.
The disagreement I have with this view is that I don't want us making
policy that
punishes the 99.9% of people who are telling the truth and just want
to run their
network, so that we can somehow "catch" the 0.01% of the scammers. I
prefer
making policy which works well for bona fide network operators.
People will always
lie, and I do not believe it’s ARIN’s job to catch that.
Also agree... writing policy to try to block the wrongdoers always makes
it harder for the legitimate users... which is the group ARIN should be
supporting.
Matthew Kaufman
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
