I agree with David here. I do believe there should be a requirement that any new allocations must keep the allocation x amount of time before it can transferred. Possibly 12 months+ which would thereby kill most ideas to sell for profit.
-Kevin > On Aug 20, 2015, at 4:05 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > Still against it because it still applies to out-region transfers where > > ARIN no > > longer has access to it and CAN NOT revoke it for fraud when the attestation > > turns out to be untrue. > > So I get what you're saying. And you're right. You and I petition ARIN, > attest > that we forecast to use a /X, we're lying, and we transfer it out of the > region and > ARIN is done with it - ARIN has no control over the block transferred out. > > The disagreement I have with this view is that I don't want us making policy > that > punishes the 99.9% of people who are telling the truth and just want to run > their > network, so that we can somehow "catch" the 0.01% of the scammers. I prefer > making policy which works well for bona fide network operators. People will > always > lie, and I do not believe it’s ARIN’s job to catch that. > > Thanks! > David > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
