On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:34 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with what you've written and its implications. The time for > RIRs being anything other than local language/time/etc is passed, > in my humble opinion. > > But here's the problem: I do not believe LACNIC would agree with > such a policy. Right now they're debating allowing an inter-RIR transfer > policy that ONLY allows inbound transfers; it disallows space from > leaving the region. A two-way policy is a non-starter. (And the > one-way policy is facing stiff opposition.)
Hi David, In that case, folks operating portions of their network in the LACNIC region should follow LACNIC's policies with LACNIC's resources. Asking ARIN for permission to do an end-run around LACNIC is so blatantly unfair that it doesn't merit serious discussion. What can we do that leads in a more positive direction? That's a harder question. Policies in the past have either been purely regional or purely global. I don't suppose that really has to be true in the future. Two or three RIRs could consent to merged policies with resources to be validly used throughout all of the participating regions. If that's a helpful destination, the discussion can be kick-started with a draft globally coordinated policy. The first draft will surely fail... but it'll start the discussion in every region. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
