Dani, Some observations only.
1) I'm generally not in favour of text that overrides all policy. I believe it is better to contain the policy that you are looking for. I have found that there can very easily be unintended repercussions. ie. Would the current text in the policy allow an organization to get space from a reserved free pool block and then transfer it? 2) I have been looking at this from a slightly different angle. Instead of the word "Need" maybe "Criteria" is better suited to the discussion. The term "Need" is a small piece of the policy puzzle, the "Criteria" is what defines it. Thanks, Kevin Blumberg > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Dani Roisman > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based > evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks > > | Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400 > | From: ARIN <[email protected]> > | To: [email protected] > | Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based > | evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks > | Message-ID: <[email protected]> > | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > | > | Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9 > | Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 > | transfers of IPv4 netblocks > | > | On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted > | "ARIN-prop-223 Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, > | and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks" as a Draft Policy. > | > | Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9 is below and can be found at: > | https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2015_9.html > > Greetings, > > There has been some stimulating dialog about the merits of 2015-9. I'd like > to > ask that in addition to any overall support or lack thereof, you also review > the > policy language and comment specifically on the changes proposed: > a) For those of you generally in support of this effort, are there any > refinements to the changes made which you think will improve this should > these policy changes be implemented? > b) For those of you generally opposed to this effort, are there any > adjustments to the policy changes which, if implemented, would gain your > support? > > -- > Dani Roisman > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
