On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:17 PM, David R Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As I read the last paragraph in NRPM section 8.2, in order for the /16 >> to be recorded under the new subsidiary's name, the subsidiary would >> have to sign an RSA, renumber the otherwise unchanging network >> infrastructure to meet ARIN's current efficiency standards and return >> or sell the excess IP addresses. >> >> Am I actually reading that right? > > > No. You are drawing a conclusion not supported by either the text or by many > years of practice. The /16 can be transferred as-is. ARIN has been given no > power in the NRPM to coerce a renumbering, return, exchange, or anything > else.
Hi David, For clarity's sake, here's the text, emphasis mine: https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#eight2 "ARIN will proceed with processing transfer requests even if the number resources of the combined organizations EXCEED WHAT CAN BE JUSTIFIED UNDER CURRENT ARIN POLICY. IN THAT EVENT, ARIN will work with the resource holder(s) to transfer the extra number resources to other organization(s) or accept a voluntary return of the extra number resources to ARIN." I don't see an "or let you keep the extra number resources' in there. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
