On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM, David R Huberman <dav...@panix.com> wrote: >> The language was introduced in draft policy 2010-6 whose rationale stated: >> "This policy also should dramatically increase the completion rate for >> transfer requests, as the evaluation of whether space is efficiently >> utilized after the transfer can occur in parallel, completely >> independently of the transfer request, and can continue even if the >> transfer request is abandoned." >> >> Still think renumbering to achieve efficient utilization as a >> consequence of the 8.2 transfer wasn't intended to be a requirement? > > I don't know for sure. I was answering your question with objective fact, > to help you help your client make an informed decision.
Hi David, I'm sure it will come as a great relief to my client that ARIN probably won't follow its policy as written because no one knows for know for sure whether they really meant it that way. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
