On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM, David R Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's a public policy document. In the absence of language to the >> contrary, the MUST is implied. And if it's not a MUST then it's >> operational guidance that doesn't belong in a POLICY document at all. > > Nevertheless, the MUST is not there and is not implied.
Hi David, The language was introduced in draft policy 2010-6 whose rationale stated: "This policy also should dramatically increase the completion rate for transfer requests, as the evaluation of whether space is efficiently utilized after the transfer can occur in parallel, completely independently of the transfer request, and can continue even if the transfer request is abandoned." Still think renumbering to achieve efficient utilization as a consequence of the 8.2 transfer wasn't intended to be a requirement? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
