Query: why IPv4 only? If you are restricting transfers to the scarce resource, why say ASNs, not 16-bit ASNs?
(Section 8 sometimes says “number resources” and sometimes says “IPv4 number resources”. Is it supposed to be IPv4 number resources in all cases?) —Sandy > On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:44 AM, WOOD Alison * DAS <alison.w...@oregon.gov> > wrote: > > Good Morning! > > Regarding Draft Policy 2018-1, Allow Inter-Regional ASN Transfers, the > shepherds have modified the problem statement as follows: > > Problem Statement: > > There is a need to allow Inter-RIR transfers of ASNs with RIRs that have an > equivalent transfer policy. The need is driven primarily by a shortage of > 16-bit ASNs, which are no longer being issued by RIRs, but are more desirable > than the available 32-bit ASNs for varied technical reasons. > > Policy statement: > > Change the first sentence in section 8.4 from: > > "Inter-regional transfers may take place only via RIRs who agree to the > transfer and share reciprocal, compatible, needs-based policies." > > To: > > "Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs may take place > only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal, compatible > needs-based policies." > > Comments: > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > > > > Please feel free to comment! > > Thank you! > > -Alison Wood > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.