On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:00:46AM -0400, Sandra Murphy wrote: > Query: why IPv4 only?
I'd support transferability of IPv6 resources too - but that is a different topic and worthy of its own thread. > If you are restricting transfers to the scarce resource, why say ASNs, > not 16-bit ASNs? Why restrict it to 16-bit ASNs? What is the benefit of such a restriction? It seems somewhat discriminatory that older companies (who due to historical reasons are more likely to have a 16-bit ASN) can transfer their ASN to another RIR, while newcomers (more likely to have a 32-bit ASN) are denied to opportunity to transfer their ASN. I support transferability of all ASNs, small or large. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.