In message <[email protected]>, Jo Rhett <[email protected]> wrote:
>Refusing to authenticate resources used by holders who cannot be >validated is a feature, not a bug. > >My fees (and everyone elses) pay ARIN to validate and certify the >resource holders. I have no dog in this fight. I just have a simple (naive?) question: Would it be possible for ARIN to establish some kind of de minimis validation/authentication fee, enough to cover its costs, but not involving the acceptance of a complete LRSA? (As I said, I have no dog in this fight. I'm just wondering if there is any middle ground that would be acceptable to all.) Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
