On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:05 PM Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In message <[email protected]>, > Jo Rhett <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Refusing to authenticate resources used by holders who cannot be > >validated is a feature, not a bug. > > > >My fees (and everyone elses) pay ARIN to validate and certify the > >resource holders. > > I have no dog in this fight. I just have a simple (naive?) question: > > Would it be possible for ARIN to establish some kind of de minimis > validation/authentication fee, enough to cover its costs, but not > involving the acceptance of a complete LRSA? > I'm not sure a de minimis fee would be appropriate, the users without contracts represent a higher legal risk to ARIN. I believe this risk is probably as much or more of an issue as the cost of the service themselves. > (As I said, I have no dog in this fight. I'm just wondering if there > is any middle ground that would be acceptable to all.) > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
