If that new internet exchange point is now independent of your org, and is
in the ARIN region, it should be obtaining its resources under 6.10.1.
These allocations are specifically for things like internet exchange
points. If they desired independence from the beginning and the ability
to avoid renumbering in the future, they should of obtained their
resources directly from ARIN.
Now that they want their independence after using your non exchange point
block since their formation, it does look like they need to renumber into
a proper exchange point block, at ARIN or the RIR where they are located
if they are not in the ARIN region.
I have looked around a bit and found that currently only RIPE has a
current policy that might permit transfers of IPv6 resources to another
RIR. If there are others, please identify the RIR and the policy, as this
would be useful in this discussion.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019, Alyssa Moore wrote:
I'd like to jump in to add another layer to the discussion so we have
everything on the table.
It's currently not possible to transfer IPv6 resource *intra*regionally in
ARIN. My org has been supporting a small/new internet exchange point and
part of that involved using a block of our IPv6. That IX now has the
ability to manage their own resources. Under current policy, it is not
possible for us to transfer them the v6 that is already in use.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:50 PM Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 21:25 Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
I am in complete agreement here. Let us not construct a policy in support
of IP policy forum shopping.
Nobody has articulated why that would be a bad thing. Do you have any
supporting data to facilitate developing an opinion one way or another?
If we want to consolidate all the RIRs into RIPE because they have the
most liberal policies and lowest fees, then let???s be honest about it and do
it directly through proposals to consolidate the other RIRs. Otherwise,
let???s recognize the inevitable consequence of this proposal regardless of
advocate???s intents (which I mostly take at face value).
You seem to blow up the scope of the proposal to impossible width. It
isn???t about money or policies; the IPv6 transfer policy proposal originates
from operational concerns related to the global availability of ARIN???s
RPKI services.
Kind regards,
Job
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
