No. But it would be appropriate IMHO to adopt policies that very strongly promote MANRS (or even a subset of it), and/or very strongly encourage ARIN members/customers/clients to adopt MANRS, and/or discourage non-MANRS-compliant number resource holders in some way.
Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services [merlin-email-logo] 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/> From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> On Behalf Of John Curran Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 5:15 PM To: Tom Samplonius <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Bagrin <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] prop266 - re-framing the discussion On May 2, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Tom Samplonius <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The Internet Society has created the MANRS initiative (https://www.manrs.org/) to encourage all networks globally to implement route security (among other things), but strangely there hasn’t been a single mention of it in any of these threads. MANRS is the best way to address hijacking, since it prevents hijacking from even happening (along with other bad things like spoofing). Tom - Excellent point. If the ISP community supports MANRS, the problem will be gone. Is it really appropriate for the RIR system become embroiled in routing enforcement before the ISPs show widespread support for good routing hygiene? /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
