>> those experts would not answer for any mistaken report. >> according the policy is ARIN the one to publish the result of such >> investigation and would be up to ARIN to act on it. >> >> so, any legal responsibility would be on ARIN. > > To follow established rules.
no, to publish someting that acuses an organazation of doing "bad" things. > >> just to add. >> those so called "experts" would be doing their investigation on data >> collected for other objectives not the one proposed in the policy. > > However, that's "public available knowledge". but not for the purposed claimed by the police what are the guarantees of correctness of data? what are the guarantees of availability? and so on... > >> there was never any guarantees on those views/archives of collected >> routes. >> >> more legal risks, I see... > > To those making the routing data public, or for ARIN? to arin > > Regards, > Carlos > > > >> -- >> Ricardo >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
