In message <CAN-Dau1CyVuayPQGibmsX6F9AvHrk7YWTy=o_bzydduwg3k...@mail.gmail.com> David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The latter can generally be distinguished from the former via the passage >> of time. If an operator has been duly notified that he/she/it is >> announcing >> a route that he/she/it shouldn't be, and if there is no change after the >> passage of a number of days, then and only then does there even begin to >> be some basis for further investigation to determine if the announcement is >> deliberate and not just a "fat fingers" error. >> > >Maybe it can be distinguished, but how much time has to laps with you >ignoring ARIN before ARIN takes away your resources? An hour, a day, a >week, a month, 90 days? I will defer to the proposal authors for an answer to this question. >Furthermore, the proposal is much more a process than it is a policy. I will also defer to the propsal authors to address this seemingly legitimate criticism. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
