Ronald F. Guilmette writes: > If people want to use 240.0.0.0/4 -internally- as private RFC1918 address > space, who's preventing them from doing so? As long as there are no route > leaks for any of this to the outside world, I don't see the issue/problem.
A very good, brief summary: http://packetlife.net/blog/2010/oct/14/ipv4-exhaustion-what-about-class-e-addresses/ Basically it has been suggested before but ended up torpedoed by the reality of huge chunks of the existing deployed base blocking it hard. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
