On 28/04/2019 05:36, Michel Py wrote:
That being said, this thing about policy violation is ridiculous. The way I see it, it's a contract violation. Policy has nothing to do with it. Now where it gets hairy is in a cross-RIR situation, where the alleged hijacked prefix is in contract with another RIR. I see it as a contract violation, therefore I oppose making it a policy violation.
So if you consider it a contract violation, what remedy do you recommend? Regards, -Hank _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
