On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:27 AM John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps, one could say: that both the Marketplace and the Waitlist are harmful to exist, since they discourage using IPv6 instead by providing a "tempting solution" to the run-out situation that is not really a solution --- the registry operating in an abnormal way where a major set of number resources can only be transferred from existing holders... not "freshly allocated" likely encourages fraud. 100% IPv6 deployment should alleviate the v4 registry issues (by eliminating the utility for v4 space) and thus remove potential incentives for bad actors. Perhaps it would make sense to have a requirement such as "Demonstrate matching IPv6 deployment for all previous allocations, and materialized plans for IPv6 deployment in all future/applied for allocations" as A required condition for receiving resources, whether by marketplace or by wait list. ... > Some have argued that no such policy is needed at all, and ARIN should simply > monetize > the number resources and use the proceeds in a manner aligned with its > mission and > productive to the community, whereas others have indicated that the policy > provides an > important option for smaller ISPs and organizations who may not be aware of > IPv4 runout > and are not readily positioned to go the marketplace. (Neither of these > views supports > the waiting list policy which was suspended, as it served far more than > simply smaller entities.) > John Curran -- -JH _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
