I do not support this draft policy. It is better to distribute the remaining IPV4 resources more evenly as per ARIN-2019-16. I believe the "early applicants" are not entitled to a greater share just because they got their applications in before the ARIN-2019-16 policy went into effect.
Fraud is probably still rampant with all 4.1.8 applications. You only need to look at the incentives that are still in place to see this is a land grab opportunity. I challenge ARIN staff to provide additional data on the "vast majority indicated that they agreed that some organizations were treated unfairly." It can be assumed that these are vocal individuals who are upset at not getting $$$,$$$ handouts from ARIN. We must stand up for the unformed startups and entrepreneurs who'll be hurt by the unfair allocation of IPv4 assets to legacy companies. Regards, Robert
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
