On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:50:16AM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:42 AM Brandt, Jason via ARIN-PPML < > arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote: [snip] > The question for me is what, clearly, is the inequity that grandfathering > addresses? Going through the process? Waiting on the list and getting > nothing? There were no guarantees made when a company got on the list as > far as I can tell. The process was minimal and I don't think it in itself > requires any special compensation. This policy, if I read the meeting > minutes correctly and Owen's comments in them, doesn't really help with > much at all.
Speaking only for myself, not any employer or any elected capacity, I oppose the policy precisely because it is a one-time action for one set of entities and (by its own logic) still leaving another set of affected entities [as noted by Andrew Dul 22 Oct) in the current state. I personally expected the community to respond to ARIN-2019-16 in some way, but as a more structural approach to wait-list handling, not a one-time action for a set of parties. Policies change, sometimes they apply going forward and other times they apply universally. The wait list has changed and will change in future in response to the needs of the community; it has never carried any guarantee or lack of risk. Cheers, Joe -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
