Hi Paul,

 

I should have said “without a change in wait-list processing rules.”

Certainly what the Board did was within their purview and appropriate in my 
view.

But it was a decidedly unusual situation that prompted the cessation of the 
waiting list, not the normal timing anybody on that list could reasonably 
expect from a natural change in policy. Leaving them in a quandary, really 
twisting in the wind.

 

An unusual situation, unrelated to these list participants, prompted a change 
in policy that ended up excluding them. All this policy seeks to do is provide 
redress for that particular population affected by this unusual situation.

 

But it seems the situation is not to be considered by many, and the new 
proposal evaluated de novo in an atmosphere that has explicitly changed to 
favor small holders over large holders in terms of access to the pool. I can 
appreciate that, things happen, but when it’s in our ability to mitigate 
unfairness related to change without much cost, I favor doing that. 

 

Regards,
Mike

 

From: Paul Andersen <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2020 6:11 PM
To: Mike Burns <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Slater <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Oppose Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2

 

 





On Nov 2, 2020, at 4:44 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

ARIN got wind of fraud and the Executive Board unilaterally ceased Waiting List 
processing without a change in rules.

 

Hi,

 

ARIN uses the ARIN Policy Development Process (The “PDP”) to produce Number 
Policy that ARIN ultimately follows.

 

Section 10.2 of the PDP allows the ARIN Board of Trustees, upon receiving 
credible information that a policy is flawed in such a way that it may cause 
significant problems if it continues to be followed, the Board of Trustees may 
suspend the policy and request a recommendation from the AC on how to proceed. 

 

In this case the Board reviewed the data provided and decided this was the 
correct course of action.

 

I’m not sure I would agree with your characterization of “without a change in 
the rules”.

 

Cheers,

 

Paul Andersen

Chair, ARIN Board of Trustees

 

 

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to