ARIN Policy Community -

To be clear, number resource issuance under the Waiting List policy was 
suspended by the ARIN Board of Trustees, and then when it was resumed, 
continuing issuance of IPv4 was done under the revised policy language that the 
ARIN AC developed and the Board adopted.  This was all done in accordance with 
the ARIN Policy Development Process (ARIN PDP.)   I write this note not to 
advocate for or against the policy change, but rather to make clear that the 
need to explicitly consider the transition aspects is hopefully unique but 
quite proper.

Changes to ARIN number resource policies are applied to requests upon approval 
and implementation, but it is worth noting that the waiting list is a bit 
unusual as it involves requests that have already been approved and 
organizations that may have been waiting some time under the belief that they 
are just awaiting available IPv4 resources for issuance (which is a very 
reasonable assumption.)

We don’t usually consider whether policy changes have specific transition 
issues to be considered at the time of policy implementation, but in hindsight 
it can easily be argued that ARIN-2019-16 would have warranted specific 
consideration of such transition issues.  (As it’s my responsibility both to 
facilitate the ARIN Policy Development Process and oversee implementation of 
adopted policies, I consider myself remiss in not foreseeing the need to 
consider these transition implications, but that realization doesn’t help much 
at this point.)

If the transition considerations of ARIN-2019-16 were explicitly considered at 
that time, one could easily argue that once available those already in the 
Waiting List should be issued IPv4 resources subject to some, none, or all of 
the revised requirements, and the outcome of that consideration documented in 
the recommended policy change.

It is perfectly reasonable for the community to raise the transition issue at 
this point and seek to have it explicitly considered.  It is for the community 
to consider what processing is most appropriate of those who were on the 
waiting list given the "Fair and Impartial” criteria in the ARIN PDP, and then 
reflect that consideration in a policy change if deemed appropriate.  To be 
clear, the explicit consideration of the appropriate handling of the pending 
requests via this policy discussion of ARIN-2020-2 is not setting any bad 
precedent, but simply documenting the implications of implementing ARIN-2019-16 
with more explicit consideration and clarity. I will endeavor to catch any 
upcoming policy changes that might have unusual transition issues and point 
such out explicitly so we may avoid the need for these sorts of discussions in 
the future.

With the above as context, I’d ask that folks continue with the discussion of 
the merits and concerns with Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers





_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to