Thank you, Jason. Well spoken. I’ve spent many hours of my life in line at Fenway Park without a World Series win and never got a refund.
YMMV, -M< On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 09:08 Brandt, Jason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's the time spent on the list. I waited 11 months on the list before > getting my allocation. Most of the organizations affected are likely to > have spent significant time on the list (unfortunately I do not have the > exact data on time > > spent waiting for affected orgs). Spending time waiting, then get put to > the back of the line so to speak and have to do it again, that's the > issue. That was time wasted that could've been spent making other > arrangements, hence they were penalized. > > > > > > > > Jason > Brandt > Senior Systems Engineer > Pearl Companies | 1200 > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > E > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > Glen > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > Ave > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > Peoria > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > Heights > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > , IL > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > 61616 > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > P: *309.679.0184* <309.679.0184> F: *309.688.5444* E: > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > *www.pearlcompanies.com | I* <http://www.pearlcompanies.com/> > nsurance ‑ Technology ‑ Automotive > > PEARL COMPANIES CONFIDENTIALITY: This communication, including > attachments, is for exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain > proprietary, > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1200+E+Glen+Ave+Peoria+Heights+,+IL+61616?entry=gmail&source=g> > confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended > recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, or distribution or the taking of > any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you > are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and > delete this communication and destroy all copies [v1.0.002]. > > > *From:* Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > > > *Sent:* Monday, November 2, 2020 07:50 > > > *To:* Brandt, Jason <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > > *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Oppose Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the > > sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:42 AM Brandt, Jason via ARIN-PPML < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I find it hard to understand how you can believe that this is "special > benefits". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Grandfathering is a common technique that addresses inequities changes > create. Governments do it and business does it. To some extent, the could > be called "special benefits". However, the context of that is different, > some feel the benefits > > create an inequity rather than resolve one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Organizations went through the approved process to get on the wait list to > *possibly* be assigned an address block. The policy on allocations was > changed, however the organizations did everything by the book > > per previous policy. The organization is now told that they have to go > through the process again and wait longer. This has nothing to do with > potential space allocation. I am all for limiting the allocation amount in > the future. However, to penalize an organization > > that has followed the process to this point is unfair. This also is no > guarantee that these organizations will receive an allocation. More likely, > they'll continue to wait. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This draft policy is simply to not penalize organizations that went > through the proper process of what was approved policy at the time. A > similar scenario would be arresting someone who has broken a law, prior to > the offense becoming law. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The question for me is what, clearly, is the inequity that grandfathering > addresses? Going through the process? Waiting on the list and getting > nothing? There were no guarantees made when a company got on the list as > far as I can tell. > > The process was minimal and I don't think it in itself requires any > special compensation. This policy, if I read the meeting minutes correctly > and Owen's comments in them, doesn't really help with much at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I continue to support this policy, not because I agree that larger > requests should be granted, but because the organizations had followed the > approved process and policies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not entirely certain where I sit on this. So far I haven't seen strong > arguments one way or the other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fair enough. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -M< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
