On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:17 PM Mark McDonald <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies > of the original message. > > On Sep 15, 2021, at 4:35 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > I recently had to get a 60A panel installed, which meant that I was paying > $1.16 per amp for the permit, while my neighbor, with a 400A panel only > paid $0.18 per amp for his permit. > A 400 Amp permit is $0.23 per amp, but if you are a large consumer and get > a 2000A permit it works out to only $0.05 per amp. > > Perhaps this is unfair, and I should ask the county to charge permit costs > by the amp instead -- but their work for issuing a 200A permit or a 400A > permit is basically identical. > The over 400A permit seems also roughly the same amount of work, but > someone getting that level of service can presumably justify an additional > $25 for the permit. > > I can’t even start to compare a limitless product (copper) to IPv4 > addresses. Imagine if that same inspector told you he’s raising the price > to inspect #6 wire 650% as that’s what ARIN is doing. ;) > Every year.. this is a recurring fee, not a one time fee. So to properly compare this, you would pay a permit fee to the government every year based on the size of your panel. Now they just raised the fee 650%. so it's $455 a year for the 60A panel.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
