That book should probably be at the Smithsonian. On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 04:57 Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 17, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes me want to say ‘let’s see the book’. It is an historic artifact that should be scanned and posted somewhere for reference. I used to think that too. Then I thought about it some more. Remember, it was just a notebook. Not a database. No error-checking. Reasonably expected. What happens when you find internal inconsistencies in the allocations of Bs? Or gaps in the record? You going to start reclaiming from AT&T? No. Nor should we. That supports the original point thought. If what are akin to scrivener's errors are OK for big corporations, they could be OK for smaller operators. Personally, the book draws out my inner nerd. I wasn't necessarily suggesting its kryptonite. Warm regards, -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
