> On Sep 17, 2021, at 01:57 , Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 17, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Makes me want to say ‘let’s see the book’. It is an historic artifact that >> should be scanned and posted somewhere for reference. > > I used to think that too. > > Then I thought about it some more. Remember, it was just a notebook. Not a > database. No error-checking. > > What happens when you find internal inconsistencies in the allocations of Bs? > Or gaps in the record? You going to start reclaiming from AT&T?
Given my experiences with AT&T over the last several days, this doesn’t seem like such a bad idea, but that’s unique to the particular example you chose and generally, no, where there is an internal inconsistency within the notebook, the current database should decide the issue. Where there is an inconsistency between the notebook and current database, but no inconsistency within the notebook, then it might be worth investigating how the inconsistency came about at least. In any case, posting a scan of the notebook somewhere as a historic artifact seems like a worthwhile museum piece even if no such reconciliation is attempted. Owen _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
