On 22/09/2021 03:49, Noah wrote:
<clip>
So they choose to lease, and address holders are happy to monetize
their holdings while they appreciate in value.
By address holders you mean LIR. So what you are saying is that some
LIR out there who requested for IPv4 based on need from ARIN, are
holding the addresses which they no longer need artificially? So that
they can lease to small WISP?
So that the purpose for which those LIR obtained the addresses in the
first place?
Suppose the addresses those LIR are holding with no intension to use
them, were still under ARIN management, dont you think the new small
WISP would have better off being served by ARIN as new needs arise.?
If LIR dont pay ARIN lots of money, why not return the idle addresses
to ARIN so that those with genuine need can be served.
That's the whole point I have been saying about the absurd IP leasing is.
It is quiet logical these organizations to be better off served by ARIN
than a third party who probably doesn't even have justification to hold
those addresses anymore. So either transfer them to someone who justify
them or return them to ARIN so it can fullfil its mission by assigning
directly to this organization.
Fernando
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
