On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 4:04 AM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> wrote: > No signatory to any ARIN RSA is permitted by policy to engage in a recurring > charge for addresses or a differentiated service charge based on the number > if addresses issued to a customer. Addresses must be provided strictly as > part of a contract for connectivity services and the number of addresses > provided shall not, in any way, affect the cost of those connectivity > services.
No, interfering with the prices a registrant charges its customers is way out of bounds. It would be out of bounds in the RSA let alone in the policy documents. If you want to go this route, here's how you write the policy: LIR-assigned number resources employed by an end user with a routing policy in which the LIR is not the primary network service provider handling the majority of the end user's associated network traffic do not count toward the LIR's efficient utilization of addresses. It's not great but at least it's in-scope for number policy. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
