On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:35 AM Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > What you wrote below is actually the current policy, why clutter things? > > " LIR-assigned number resources employed by an end user with a routing > policy in which the LIR is not the primary network service provider handling > the majority of the end user's associated network traffic do not count > toward the LIR's efficient utilization of addresses."
Hi Mike, Because that isn't the current policy. The addresses have to be contractually attached to some network resource you sell me but I don't have to use them with the resource. Primarily or even at all. I talked about this in recent posts: right now someone who wants to just be in the business of leasing addresses can meet ARIN policy by providing a nil-cost network resource along with the addresses with the wink-and-nod expectation that the lessee won't use it. This is the "VPN" example. The parties would have to be a little careful with their wording to avoid committing fraud but it's easily enough structured. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
