I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion
and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same
justification, only 16-bit ASN.
I would also like to understand it better.
Regards
Fernando
On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote:
Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not,
this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy
should be retitled accordingly.
I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but
would like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change
whether it is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to
do it”.
Scott
On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:
Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
