Great I agree your policy. On Saturday, January 22, 2022, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> You answered an either-or question with a Y. I’m not on the AC, but if I > were the shepherd on this proposal I would not be able to incorporate your > opinion into my assessment of community consensus for or against this > policy proposal. If you want your opinion to be considered, you might want > to express it in English. > > Scott > > On Jan 22, 2022, at 12:16 PM, Mattapally Technologies < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Y > > On Saturday, January 22, 2022, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Are you disagreeing with Owen, or objecting to some part of the proposed >> changes from 2021-4? If the latter, which change, and why? Despite my >> initial concerns, it doesn’t appear that it actually changes policy with >> regard to inter-region ASN transfers, which have been allowed for years. >> >> Scott >> >> On Jan 22, 2022, at 3:23 AM, Mattapally Technologies < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> On Friday, January 21, 2022, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> There’s a valid argument to be made that there is no longer any >>> (technical) valid reason to treat 16 and 32-bit ASNs differently… ASNs are >>> ASNs today. >>> >>> Owen >>> >>> >>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 09:58 , Fernando Frediani <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion >>> and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same >>> justification, only 16-bit ASN. >>> >>> I would also like to understand it better. >>> >>> Regards >>> Fernando >>> On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote: >>> >>> Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not, >>> this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy should be >>> retitled accordingly. >>> >>> I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but would >>> like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change whether it >>> is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to do it”. >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ARIN-PPML >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription >>> at:https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ARIN-PPML >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >>
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
