You answered an either-or question with a Y. I’m not on the AC, but if I were the shepherd on this proposal I would not be able to incorporate your opinion into my assessment of community consensus for or against this policy proposal. If you want your opinion to be considered, you might want to express it in English.
Scott > On Jan 22, 2022, at 12:16 PM, Mattapally Technologies > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Y > >> On Saturday, January 22, 2022, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Are you disagreeing with Owen, or objecting to some part of the proposed >> changes from 2021-4? If the latter, which change, and why? Despite my >> initial concerns, it doesn’t appear that it actually changes policy with >> regard to inter-region ASN transfers, which have been allowed for years. >> >> Scott >> >>>> On Jan 22, 2022, at 3:23 AM, Mattapally Technologies >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> -1 >>> >>>> On Friday, January 21, 2022, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> There’s a valid argument to be made that there is no longer any >>>> (technical) valid reason to treat 16 and 32-bit ASNs differently… ASNs are >>>> ASNs today. >>>> >>>> Owen >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 09:58 , Fernando Frediani <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion >>>>> and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same >>>>> justification, only 16-bit ASN. >>>>> >>>>> I would also like to understand it better. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Fernando >>>>> >>>>> On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote: >>>>>> Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not, >>>>>> this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy should >>>>>> be retitled accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but would >>>>>> like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change whether >>>>>> it is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to do it”. >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ARIN-PPML >>>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>>>>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>>>>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ARIN-PPML >>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>>>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>>>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ARIN-PPML >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
