Pitch perfect points herein:
- Transfer market already successful
- Avoids a "highly litigious reclamation process"
- Leasing is a natural evolution of the Transfer process
- Section 12 allows both for a reclamation due to misuse, and for a
green light after 5 years.
I withdraw my initial "can o' worms" objection - when likening them to
transfers, it looks like we already have controls in place.
On 2023-05-07 3:08 p.m., David Farmer via ARIN-PPML wrote:
In my opinion, the 60-month probation on transfers in section 4.1.8 is
intended to prevent immediate monetization through the transfer market
of IPv4 resources obtained from the waiting list. Allowing the lease
of IPv4 resources obtained from the waiting list prior to the end of
the 60-month probation would seem to flaunt the intent of the
probation. However, once past the 60-month probation, allowing the
transfer or lease of IPv4 resources seems consistent with the policies
intent.
I would like to point out that the transfer market has been remarkably
successful in making IPv4 resources voluntarily available that
otherwise would not have been available or would have required a
highly litigious reclamation process to be made available. In
addition, leasing seems to be a natural evolution of the transfer
market for those that do not have the capital funding to obtain IPv4
resources on the transfer market. Finally, despite a few issues, the
waiting list has also been remarkably successful at ensuring any IPv4
resources returned to ARIN, for whatever reason, are redistributed to
the ARIN community.
Suggestions that ARIN should instead auction the waiting list
resources, while seemingly logical, given the success of the transfer
market, nevertheless seem incompatible with ARIN's not-for-profit status.
In summary, leasing IPv4 resources obtained from the waiting list
after the 60-month probation should be allowed. Prior to that, leasing
should not be allowed. How we effectively enforce that is another
question entirely, and I personally don't have any good answers to
that question.
Thanks
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:54 AM WOOD Alison * DAS
<[email protected]> wrote:
Good morning PPML!
I would like community feedback on the leasing of ip space that is
obtained from the waitlist. Please let me know what you think and
if a policy proposal would be warranted.
Thank you!
-Alison
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:[email protected] <mailto:email%[email protected]>
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
Ron Grant
Balan Software/Networks
Network Architecture & Programming
604-737-2113
ca.linkedin.com/in/obiron
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
