Thus spake Martin Hannigan ([email protected]) on Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 05:12:49PM -0500: > 1. Agree that Community Network, defined in Section 2, should be > capitalized and updated throughout the document. > > This would appear to be an entirely editorial change. > > 2. Agree that the header of Section 6.5.9 could be deleted
I agree with that as well. > Does the NRPM need a Community Networks special treatment policy anymore? > V6 costs and policy have liberalized and it seems just as easy to qualify > under standard policy. I think that's the wrong comparison. I would view this as enabling Community Networks to get a real GUA block to avoid a lifetime of camping out in ULA space and ending up with NAT. Trying to fit them into the mold of an LIR or end-user could raise the bar just high enough such that they wouldn't bother becoming a member. Dale _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
