> On Dec 20, 2023, at 12:20, Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thus spake Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML ([email protected]) on Mon, Dec 18, > 2023 at 12:23:31PM -0800: >> I don’t favor striking the first paragraph. While the topics are out of >> scope for policy, they provide a good record of the rationale behind this >> otherwise strange carveout. Losing the rationale would likely eventually >> lead to losing track of why the policy exists, potentially resulting in loss >> of the policy. > > Good point. Though, would it make sense to move/add any additional context > into 2.11 to clarify that intent?
Section 2 is definitions. Not sure this really fits there, but not super strongly opposed to moving if people feel it will work better there. I think having the context proximate to the policy is actually helpful in many cases. Owen _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
