On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:16 PM Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2024, at 06:55, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks seeking a /16 are doing it with paperwork tigers. > > Are there “folks seeking a /16”?
I know of no imminent plague of unreasonable IPv6 requests. But if one organization will do it then two will and if two will then it's hard to say where it'll stop. What I don't want is for us to see these unreasonable allocations and decide we need to tighten the criteria and make the paperwork more of a hassle. I'd rather set the cap lower and if someone wants to pay the cost of being in the top category under the cap then so be it. Implicit in my argument is, of course, that the /16 allocation ARIN made was unreasonable, the product of a paperwork tiger divorced from genuine use. Convince me I'm wrong if you can. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
