On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:59 PM Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > Well that looks like an area of policy that needs to be tightened.
Hi Mark, That's just the thing - I don't want us to tighten IPv6 policy. I want to leave it nice and flexible... and capped at a small enough allocation that we can afford to stay nice and flexible indefinitely. The current /16 is not that cap. It's too large. Hence my support for this policy proposal which shrinks it to /20. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
