On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 1:42 PM David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > 6RD is a red herring, ARIN-2010-2 capped justifications for transition > technology (6RD) at /24, in 6.5.3.1. > > 6.5.3.1. Subsequent Allocations for Transition > Justification for the subsequent subnet size will be based > on the plan and technology provided with a /24 being the > maximum allowed for a transition technology.
Hi David, A) 6rd is not necessarily a transitional technology. Certainly the NRPM does not define it so. If I say my use is permanent, what basis would ARIN staff have to disagree? B) The concern expressed in the policy proposal was for *initial* justifications. Even if ARIN determined that 6rd could account only for a /24 of efficient use for a *subsequent* allocation, the addresses would already be gone in the initial allocation which places no such constraint. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
