Hi John,
> As noted, I remain unclear about the aggregation properties of your Outer > Space/Celestial Body-based allocation scheme (as opposed to allocations that > follow and thus naturally aggregate within the network topology of agency > space networks), but understand that further clarity is unlikely to be > obtained without some actual hard parameters and modeling. You assert a gain > in aggregation, and let’s take that as given assumption for the time being. Two words for you to meditate on: nested abstraction. > Now the world is a dynamic place, and as a result, let’s hypothecate some of > the questions that arise in the early years of operation – All of the points that you make below are largely the same as for any ISP. I don’t see why you’re making this molehill into a mountain. I get that they are important and I acknowledge that they will take work, but I don’t see them as a serious impediment. I get that you don’t wanna do this. I don’t understand why. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
