Hi Fernando,

> I am wondering the real numbers behind this discussion.
> 
> How many missions/space agencies there are in the works or in planning that 
> justifies the time spent with such discussion to have something specific ? I 
> imagine it is a pretty small number because of obvious reasons: high cost, 
> complexity, low number of space agencies and projects running from time to 
> time. What stops or what is so difficult for space agencies, to simply ask 
> for IP space for their respective RIR, as it always have been, and use that 
> IP space on whatever projects or missions they justify for ? Why do we need 
> to differentiate this usage for such a supposed low amount of cases.
> 

There are only a handful of agencies.  That is not the issue.  The real problem 
occurs because they are geographically dispersed and would naturally get 
addresses from their local RIR. But when they use them on the moon, for 
example, they would not aggregate at all.   We might easily expect one prefix 
per mission.  Today, that’s not seriously problematic, but in the future, this 
could definitely become annoying.

> IP addressing to other planets ? Come on !
> We barely have missions with few equipment on the Moon, Mars and few other 
> places.
> The way it looks like, it seems in the next years there will be a mesh 
> network of point to point links between all planets of solar system.
> 

Our job is not just to deal with the next few years, but to anticipate and 
provide for the long term.  i’d suggest that trying to plan 30 to 50 years into 
the future would be reasonable.  With that perspective, it is quite clear that 
recent decreases in the cost of launches has agencies planning for a new 
Renaissance in space exploration, complete with colonization by many vehicles 
and human beachheads, all fully interconnected.

Here are some links to some different visions of the future:

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/nterplanetary-Internet-Network-Concept-Credits-NASA_fig7_346016205

https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/lunanet_dtn_graphic_100521.png

https://i0.wp.com/spacenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/queqioa-constellation-V3-DSEL-2oct2023-AJ-SN-scaled.jpg?resize=1568%2C886&ssl=1

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366211910/figure/fig1/AS:11431281106938421@1670901461512/Reference-architecture-for-future-SpaceNets-EOSN-Earth-Orbit-Satellite-Network-SN.ppm

Cheers,
Tony

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to