Hi Fernando,
>> There are only a handful of agencies. That is not the issue. The real >> problem occurs because they are geographically dispersed and would naturally >> get addresses from their local RIR. But when they use them on the moon, for >> example, they would not aggregate at all. We might easily expect one >> prefix per mission. Today, that’s not seriously problematic, but in the >> future, this could definitely become annoying. > Why do we need this level of separation ? Geolocation or something similar > would resolve this much easily. Creating a new stuff for such a small and > specific need doesn't seem useful. There are alternatives that wouldn't > involve all this. > Do tell. How do we get aggregation across diverse agencies? >> Our job is not just to deal with the next few years, but to anticipate and >> provide for the long term. i’d suggest that trying to plan 30 to 50 years >> into the future would be reasonable. With that perspective, it is quite >> clear that recent decreases in the cost of launches has agencies planning >> for a new Renaissance in space exploration, complete with colonization by >> many vehicles and human beachheads, all fully interconnected. > Still with the decrease of costs it is still quiet expensive to launch a > mission so I don't believe we would expect a significant number that requires > a totally different schema than we already have working and well established > with the current RIRs. It doesn't justify. > This is not going to be a major issue to any missions and to how internet on > earth communicate to missions outside it. > Well, then you doom us to a swamp in outer space. Tony
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
