Definitely put no royalty fees at the top.
On January 8, 2017 3:42:50 PM GMT+03:00, Alexander Ross
<[email protected]> wrote:
>How to market eoma68 vs intel card in a positive way?
>
>Heres a go, please edit,suggest as you feel. hmm sounds like a wiki
>page
>is coming :) :
>
>EOMA68:
>*Grass roots developed - made by someone who cares
>*Any processor make
>*Made with free software and its developers in mind. to help advance
>and
>fund free software.
>*Hardware that just works for free software and there for any software
>*Makes it easier for the creation and maintenance of many, yet to be
>thought of, new devices.
>*Higher Spec additional standard EOMA200 in the works after current
>ones
>products are in the market.
>*Smaller, extra compact card Spec, EOMACF addition also on the future
>list.
>*Only certification fees. No royalty fees
>*Made by for profit making but good will first company, as opposite to
>extreme maximising company. The priority is the best computer card
>standards.
>*EOMA68 is spec’ed for lower power consuming devices. ideal for battery
>power devices. See future EOMA200 for high power consumption / more
>powerful computers(SOCS)
>*hmm what else?
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to [email protected]
