Indeed there is no need for royalties, and the lack of it is worth advertising
and will grab attention.
I also think you should advertise the low power of the standard that's a big
plus.
On January 10, 2017 11:33:14 AM GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<[email protected]> wrote:
>---
>crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Allan Mwenda <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>> Definitely put no royalty fees at the top.
>
> to be taken seriously, like for example the HDMI standard, compliance
>with the EOMA68 standard has to be outsourced to accredited
>Certification Companies (such as ACG-Cert).
>
> these companies, obviously, will need to be paid. it will,
>obviously, be a one-off cost per test. recertification _is_ likely to
>be needed... again this will, obviously, be a one-off cost per test.
>
> i don't see any need for "royalties".
>
>l.
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to [email protected]
