Its not really a problem, since the funds are basically from strong arming
manufacturers with "royalties" and EOMA68 so far has been an ethical project.
Indeed a logo is a brilliant idea, and use of it only by certified products
would be excellent. I think also you should be prepared for Chinese clones,
they'll definitely happen, the question is whether you'll make it easy for them
to be proper ones.
On January 10, 2017 12:19:31 PM GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<[email protected]> wrote:
>---
>crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Alain Williams <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:50:24AM +0300, Allan Mwenda wrote:
>>> Indeed there is no need for royalties, and the lack of it is worth
>advertising and will grab attention.
>>> I also think you should advertise the low power of the standard
>that's a big plus.
>>
>> Which exposes one of the problems that Open Source/Spec/... projects
>have
>> compared to Closed ones. Things like royalties do provide cash for
>things like
>> marketing.
>
> true
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to [email protected]
