> Looks good. > > Could I ask you to produce variants of this: > > 1) without colour
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321752 > 2) low resolution/small size 100p wide: https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321542 > 3) (1) & (2) https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321642 > The reason is that a logo is going to be used in many places and still has to > be > robustly recognisable. So all candidate logos should be 'tested' by checking > how > they look when mangled as above. > > Regards Licenses: Same as before (Whatever lkcl wants, otherwise cc-sa-by-4.0) _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
