I don't like it, I dunno. It's bland.
On January 30, 2017 2:19:04 AM GMT+03:00, James L <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Could I ask you to produce variants of this:
>>
>> 1) without colour
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321752
>
>> 2) low resolution/small size
>
>100p wide:
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321542
>
>> 3) (1) & (2)
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321642
>
>> The reason is that a logo is going to be used in many places and
>still has to be
>> robustly recognisable. So all candidate logos should be 'tested' by
>checking how
>> they look when mangled as above.
>>
>> Regards
>
>Licenses: Same as before (Whatever lkcl wants, otherwise cc-sa-by-4.0)
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to [email protected]
