On 07/04/2017 01:01 PM, Bill Kontos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:28 PM, zap <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sorry but I have to challenge you on this, it isn't right for systemd to >> be the only init that can be used on debian by default. > This doesn't make any sense. The default is what it is, a single > option from a set of options that is the default one. There can only > be one default. Not all sets of options can be selected on setup > otherwise installing Debian would take longer than compiling gentoo. Yes that didn't make sense my bad. I meant it shouldn't be the only one usable on debian.
> Systemd is apparently just the default option. And my problem is, > people like you seem to believe that debian is some sort of > organization that decides for the shake of their users. Wrong. Debian > is a community first, if users want something, they can add it. There > are alternative inits available but apparently nobody cares enough to > maintain and script them. Which begs the question, why are systemd > haters so vocal but do nothing about it ? It seems like those who > actually did the work scripting for inits chose to work for systemd > only, and now it's just a bunch of people who demand stuff without > offering anything in return( i.e. work). > Openrc and Runit are better. In my humble opinion. again I am not anti-systemd I am for choice. > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
